25 November 2016

Religion, politics, and a space to breathe

Dear Ren,

23rd November 2016, 20:29

Just a quick start to this. Thanks for your letter which arrived as I'm struggling with the middle section of Ice Child - the weather, a tooth extraction, and general exhaustion, I think. Still no shrugging, though.

I was going to say how odd it is that I always start letters (and emails) with the end of the letter I'm writing back to, and now I've written seven lines already without saying what I was going to start with, which is that I don't actually know when your birthday is. Sorry. Barolo, what a wonderful name for a wine - the word rolls round your mouth just like that rich red flavour. I must go back to drinking more red again. I always prescribe it for friends when they have colds.


My desk is stacked high with research for the novel, with a print-out of your letter, Mixed States (because I had to go and read On Not Repeating Myself), day job notebooks and papers (hidden on the photos because they have to be secret), two PCs and keyboards and mice (and my new writing CD on the stereo behind me because the one I'd been using so far seems to have lost its effect).
 
One last thing tonight, before I go back to Ice Child - your letters are like your poems. They go out and gather all these thoughts and facts and emotions, and pull them all together, and get to an ending that, like I said to you yesterday, haunts. And that is the right word, not because of your recurring ghosts, but because it's the best word I can find to say those endings stay with me, become engrained. Maybe that is what ghosts are - some part of some soul, of some nature, that is so intense it stays with you forever. There. I think it must be true.
 
to be continued in the morning
 
 
24th November 2016, 12:15
 
Life is fragmented. I got up at 6:30 and thought I'd get some writing (inc this letter) done, but what with exchanging about 12 words with M before she left at 6:55 and then dealing with some work emails until I woke A at 7:30, and then talking with her over breakfast (and seeing K out of the door at 8:08), and then seeing her out of the door at 8:40, time in the mornings seems to disintegrate and hours pass. And yet I don't regret this, because soon they'll all be living somewhere else and I'll not be able to be nice or curmudgeonly with them in the mornings. Actually, I took A to have a look at a high school where she might do her A-levels from Sept yesterday, and when we got home, A, K, and I had a nice talkie lunch together. I'm so lucky to work from home. M was quite upset she'd not been there for that lunch. I like, I love those spontaneous moments with my family.
 
Back to your letter - I've not picked up Cursed Child  since last week. Much of my time is going into making sure my voice is heard somewhere about the appalling political situations the UK and the US have got themselves into. I did write an open letter on my blog to the Electoral College, but that will have been ignored along with all our pleas for unity and sanity and tolerance. On Sunday, though, my show on the radio will be two hours of political songs, and I don't care who complains, and I certainly won't be impartial, because that's not how I do things.
 
By the way, I'm very glad for you that E and I don't have looks in common. He's a tall, handsome, striking man, and I couldn't be further from that. Good job M likes me short, dumpy and very distracted most of the time. When I've read Cursed Child, I'll see what happens about the rules of magic. Mind you, isn't the magic thing about magic that there can never be any rules?
 
See, you are more clever than me - I don't even know what a Hegelian spiral is. Though that brings me to the communalities between the mentally disordered and creative people - I often think they are one and the same. O often asks me why I don't got to the doctor about my depression. Answer is that I think it's mild, nothing compared to those who really suffer, and that I use it to fuel my writing. I often feel that I write my best when I'm at my unhappiest. Perhaps I'm a fool, not a poet. Also, I'm not sure I have the courage to reveal myself, to confront myself in conversation with my doctor, as with a shrink. Although I have to admit my last appointment with my acupuncturist (whom I'm going to see later) reduced me to tears because she does make me confront myself with truths I am too often not prepared to accept. But the last thing I want to do is to have the energy and the words cured away. Because, truthfully, that would be death.
 
 

 Politics, all the time. Even writing this, about me, I have this going on at the back of my mind. I know we all have very dark, evil places in our souls - that's what writing is about, dealing with those things. We're all greedy, we're all capable of doing appalling things - but we don't, because we learn to tell the difference between right and wrong, because we know the value of love, friendship, freedom, and peace. To be honest (I use that phrase too much), self-loathing is better than loathing those who are different from us to the extreme of wanting to destroy them. Because that's where those on the right (and I don't just mean the extreme right) are, and where they've always been - they want to eradicate anything and anyone that's different to them. And even if they stop short of eradication, they want to subjugate. All right-wing politicians are nothing but ethnic cleansers. And those who are on the Evangelical Right - they're not Christians. How can you claim to be of any faith if you approve of war, violence, misogyny and other countless crimes against humanity? It's madness of a particularly malicious kind.
 
You know, there's nothing wrong with fanning the flames of knowledge, understanding, and resistance to the above.
 
Ufarliggjøring - to make less dangerous, to defuse; all these definitions have two sides. Do you make something less dangerous in the sense of making it appear harmless (which actually makes it more dangerous), or by removing from it the potential to be dangerous (which really does disarm it)? Are normalisers just teaching the world to accept the bomb, or are they taking the firing mechanism out of the bomb? I think it's the first, and I don't want the world to be like that. Fascists are fascists are fascists, and no amount of spin can change that. And they're evil. Enough!
 
What I've always loved about the Potter series is that it's built on this idea of there always being a safe place, that there will always be someone who loves you. The idea that good will ultimately overcome evil is one we all like, isn't it? That's why the books have been so successful. I have read them all at least 4 times, although I have never gone to huge lengths to analyse them beyond what I've just said. I know Rowling always says Dumbledore was homosexual. I can't say that I ever had the sense that Greyback was an analogy for homosexuality, though. Being a boy at heart, I probably just focused on the adventure and the battles. And then the question is - are there really that many layers under what novelists write? Should we even take the liberty to assume there are, and to look for things that might not even be there? I know some people have given Dead Men interpretations that never crossed my mind when I was writing it, nor when I'd finished it. In the end, I think all writing is about the quest for redemption, even if that quest is not always completed. I don't know if that makes me a believer in the original sin - something I think I'm not.
 
I love this conclusion of yours - "... men ... battle nature from without their bodies, women from within." I think this is so true, and manifested in so many different ways. How women think (though that will always be a mystery to me), how they read, how they intuit, how they interact. But then maybe that's why we still live in such an overwhelmingly patriarchal society - because women have always had to fight those internalised battles, have always had to fight with themselves, while men have always just fought with each other and thereby conquered the planet. Or perhaps that's me now ascribing too many layers to life, when, essentially, life should be straightforward and simple. (But it's not, he thinks).
 
 
Full circle to On Not Repeating Myself. On reading it again, I find it frighteningly prescient about this correspondence, and so accurate about how life moves on, from then to now, to the things we don't even know about yet. Poetry, you see, I think, has infinitely more levels and layers than novels (all novelists will now come to lynch me.) Brevity = more possible tangents of thought; length = more linear and less room to drift, counter-intuitively. Though, having said all that, Ice Child at the moment is transmogrifying into a jangled portrait of a disturbed mind, a mind disturbed by circumstance and ambition rather than by chemical imbalances. Maybe it's the change in writing music that's done that - it hasn't, not really; there was always the chance of this metamorphosis. My biggest problem is that I often turn into my characters, rather than them coming from me in the first place.
 
16:43
 
There'll be traces on this paper of tobacco, seeing as I roll my cigarettes here on the desk, and possibly some traces of smoke because I very occasionally smoke in here - not while writing these letters though.
 
I fell asleep so deeply and rapidly in my acupuncture session today that K made me jump when she started wafting her moxa stick over my bare back. Oh, that heat is so wonderfully nourishing, and the scent a wonder, too. We used moxa in a futile attempt to move the still-in-womb C from a breach position. She did move around a lot, but didn't turn. I think she wanted to be a footling birth, different from her siblings. Oh my, how our children shape our lives.
 
And that brings me from beginning to end, old age and food and religion. Yes, we should just focus on knowing ourselves better, our nature, and our part of nature. That's the problem with those fascists - they don't even understand what nature is, what natural is. And religion as "just a recognition that becomes impossible not to see as one ages," that's not such a far-fetched idea, you know. And I don't just mean Christianity; I mean any faith. My father bought me a copy of the Qur'an for my confirmation - but I'm sure you knew that already. I am sure of one thing - my faith has never removed from me the fear of death, although it leads me to question that fear.
 
I told K that I think all my back troubles (and all the other malfunctions of this body I inhabit) come from my fear of the world. She promptly put a needle in my kidney point (also where fear is centred) and I nearly went flying off the treatment table. Maybe it's released me, through that pain, from some of my fear.
 
So here I am, unable as always to draw all these thoughts into a haunting conclusion. All I can say and mean is that this thinking out loud is helping all my other writing, and giving me a space to breathe in this rushing and dangerous time. For that I thank you.
 
Klem and love to you, and all yours,
 
Rx
 
 
 
 

17 November 2016

Tangents, and not tangents

Dear Ren,

Interesting, these letters. I love the way they go off on tangents which then prove not to be tangents at all. And I think I like writing these in ink first so that I don't go back and self-edit. Because, although these are private letters (maybe personal is a better word) they are going public straightaway, and I don't want to end up writing as if I were addressing the public. This is a letter to you that I choose to share.

I'm writing this to the CD I've put together to do all my 2016 writing to - I know you think it's odd, but if I feel there's going to be a theme to my writing (or my mind) I'll put something together. Sometimes it's just for a particular book (and it'll say so on the CD). For The Failed Assassin I didn't need to put one together (if I remember correctly) because Lana del Rey's Born To Die album was perfect - I just put it on repeat, and away I went. I used Catfish & the Bottlemen's The Balcony in the same way for The Immortality Clock, which is sitting somewhere waiting for me to publish it.

By the way, I never refer back to my previous letters, so if I end up repeating myself, so be it. Before the internet I wouldn't have been able to do that anyway, as I'm not in the habit of making copies (long-hand or photo) of any letters I write.

Anyway - what you say about the acceptance of weather viz Ben Saunders and you on a mountain, brings back a memory, or memories combined. I'm sure I read somewhere a long long time ago, that Native Americans taught their children (mainly the boys) that they had to relax and let the cold pass through them, or take it in as energy, to survive it. And then they would send them out into the cold for a night or more, naked, and they would be adults when they came back. That's one half of the memory. The other half is that two or three days after M and I first got together (the weekend after, it will have been) A (so I am editing names, sorry), now O's godmother, came to stay, and we went for a really long walk on the hills around Newbury, and she was cold, so I gave her my jumper and told her that Native American story and tried to apply it (and it worked), and at the same time told her that I'd fallen in love with M (and A was always the first to know about my loves because she's such a good old friend, was even then). Some might say that this relaxing, this acceptance, can be deadly, too, in the cold, in space - some people call it euphoria, and it can lead to you wanting to stay exactly where you are, because you never want to lose it. And it's certainly not a bracing feeling.

I'd like to see Lodén's paper/essay about you and read it in Norwegian. I bet late means mature (and I'm not having a go at your Norwegian); it's your typical modesty/self-doubt that turns it into the harbinger of the end of an era. Your publisher must love your work very much, or maybe he knows something you don't know about the kulturråd, or he is simply as sure as I am that you're quite brilliant and your voice has to be heard. On the being published, part of it is prestige, I suppose, and, again, that validation from a third party, that's what it is about. But does it matter that it's about that? We're human, after all. And, actually, third-party validation comes as much from people buying self-published books, or taking poems along with gingerbread. (I always like to eat when I'm reading, although K, my acupuncturist, tells me I shouldn't because the body should focus on food entirely, not anything else).

I always keep meaning to read some Crace, ever since you told me a long time ago that he's your favourite novelist. I think writing different genres is just an expression of the different people in our heads, so yes, Jekyll and Hyde, but more of them than just the two. Not just that, but writers are story tellers, and why tell the same type of story every time? The more variety the better. I don't think they had genres  sitting round the fires in the very olden days, and I don't think those listening decided not to listen to their story teller from one day to the next because he'd changed the type of story we was performing. It's an invention of marketers, and yet more proof that writing is becoming nothing more than product to be placed, which I guess brings me nicely to agree with you about populism (in more things than just writing), although I'm not sure the Dylan Nobel Prize is necessarily a symptom of that (All Along the Watch Tower is just a poem set to music, I have always felt).

You've not told me much about your project, so you won't lose momentum. And we'll leave that there, just like I'll tell you nothing more about Ice Child except that I've been spending most of nano editing rather than writing with abandon. But it'll be better for that - characters need to have a base before they can go off and do their own thing and tell me about it.

It's just gone 9pm and I've relocated from the office to the kitchen. It's the time of day when I grab myself a beer and go outside to drink (too greedily) from it, and to have a cigarette in the other hand. I always used to do this when we'd put the children to bed and they were asleep - a big relax, but not so big now because a) they're still up, and b) there always seems to be something to do. So writing to you once a week has become a good, calming, relaxing thing.

Interesting that you and your ex share that wonderful old lady dog whom I have a couple of photos of. I didn't know that. I guess it just goes to show how much of our lives they take over. Only for me, as you know, cats not dogs. And I needed the cat today as it was a really bad morning. I told C on fb I was having a bad time, and she messaged me back suggesting I read a book or spend time with the cat. So I did both - lay stomach-down on C's bed, started reading The Cursed Child, and the cat came and lay down beside me. Of course, what I had been waiting for all morning (3 hours) came within 15 minutes of me starting to read. Typical! (I can't control how many loops I put into some words when writing long-hand - how weird is that?)

The missing my children thing - even when they're not here I go into their bedrooms to say good night when I go to bed. I think I got that from my mother - she did it, too. At least I don't go round unplugging every electrical device - she did. Not sure the cat is preparing C for my demise. The children have been through several cat deaths already, but I think children always think their parents are immortal. Even when Mum had been fully taken over by dementia I think I still thought she'd get through it and live forever. I love what you said about the Old Lady - first a baby, then an elder. I wonder why I'd never thought of that - perhaps because cats are mostly always frivolously contrary. Maybe that's how I want to be when I get older. When I get the time to - because although I'd always hoped that getting older would bring me stability (financial and other) and time, that hasn't happened - yet. And I long to have time to be without worry, and to be creative, and to write lots of letters to lots of people.

We do need animals, and we do need people, in our lives. We can learn from both. It's just that I very often doubt that I've been paying attention to the lessons. Because, somehow, with every day that passes I feel increasingly lost in a world that somehow doesn't quite make sense anymore. And, to be honest, I refuse to accept the world as it is. I refuse to resign. Maybe that's the reason for me feeling more of an outsider than ever. Whether or not I can rejoice in that, I'm not sure, but I suppose it's better than just shrugging and giving up.

On that positive note,

much love to you and E, and the boys, and the Old Lady,

Rx

12 November 2016

An open letter to the Free Electors of the USA

Dear Free Electors,

On December 19th, you have a huge opportunity to demonstrate that the Electoral College set up by the Founding Fathers is not an irrelevance in this day and age. An opportunity to demonstrate to your own legal experts and leading thinkers on the law that the Electoral College is not an anachronism but an instrument of balance, a force, as originally intended, to halt dictatorship and despotism in your united states, to prevent all power from being concentrated in a single person's hands. You have an opportunity, too, to act not just for the good of your country but for the good of the entire world. You have the power not to let Donald Trump ascend to the presidency of the USA, and to prevent Mike Pence from becoming Vice-President.

Consider this, from your Declaration of Independence:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

There can be no doubt that Mr Trump and Mr Pence threaten the equality of people, that they threaten to withdraw from many those inalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and that any government they would head would be destructive of these ends. And no doubt that their betrayal of your Declaration of Independence would also seek to withdraw those rights from people around the globe.

Consider this, from your Constitution:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

Mr Trump, as President, and Mr Pence as Vice-President, would not be acting to establish justice, nor to ensure domestic tranquillity, nor promote general welfare for all the inhabitants of the United States. And they would withdraw the blessings of liberty from your country, as well as causing to fall apart that "more perfect Union" of states.

Consider this, from your Bill of Rights:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

This is just one of the ten constitutional amendments which make up your Bill of Rights which Mr Trump has expressly declared that he will repeal, with the support of Mr Pence. Has he not by this statement alone already breached your constitution, and is he therefore not already unfit to serve, as is Mr Pence?

Therefore, dear Free Electors of the USA, do not cast your vote for Mr Trump or Mr Pence on 19th December. Even those of you in the 24 states which against all notions of liberty bind their Electors can refuse to cast your votes for Mr Trump and Mr Pence at the risk only of small penalties. Is that not a risk worth taking so that the constitution of your country remains intact, for your reputation in the world to be less tarnished? What price is worth paying for liberty and peace in the world? And those of you in the 22 states which do not bind their Electors, you have no obligation whatsoever to cast your votes for two men who would divide not just your united states but would destroy the entire world. I would urge you all to cast your votes for Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine instead.

Yours, in hope,

R

edited on 28th November to urge the Electors to withhold their votes from Mike Pence, too.

11 November 2016

Otherness, writing & real letters

My dear Ren,

I'm so glad I followed my instinct and wrote and sent you my last letter in its physical form. Glad it arrived with you on a dark day (for us all). Glad it reminded you of your grandmother's letters - even if that was just because I ran out of one type of paper. Mind you, I don't believe there is any such thing as coincidence. I believe in serendipity instead. Your letter made me happy.

I believe that all conversations are meaningful and change the world. We could be talking about the weather and it would mean something - it's that effect of butterfly wings thing. It's words being released into the world. My mother used to tell me to be careful of what I said out loud, because my words would travel around the world and be heard by many people wherever the wind chose to take those words. I think what I do now is probably the opposite of the cautious approach she wanted me to take.

My not caring about what people say comes from my laziness rather than male confidence. I am tired of having to jump through hoops to impress people, be they gatekeepers or not, tired of having to be politic and playing the game. That's why I've never dived into that whole marketing and algorithms thing, why I hardly read anything about self-publishing, why I am actually useless about marketing myself. The media whore thing is just that - I love being the centre of attention. But I only do it so much; I don't push myself at all the media outlets I should be pushing myself at if I really wanted to be plastered over all the papers and radio and TV. I often see that as cowardice, not just laziness. And yes, I do still hanker after external validation, but ... . The silence I interpret as not being read rather than my writing being poor. I also interpret it as review fatigue when people are being asked to review every little thing they buy.

Another thing on male confidence - I am not an alpha male, and never have been. It's not in my makeup - maybe because I have 3 sisters. In my youth, I refused to compete for girls, would just walk away from such overt male competitions. I even did the same with M, before we were properly together, because, as I said to her then, I refuse to let others lead my life for me. I don't think that's confidence; if anything it's diffidence. I have to shrug my shoulders here and say that it's just the way I am, and that I have never spent a huge amount of time thinking about it. Having said that, I'm still the same about alpha male behaviour - because A (youngest daughter) plays a lot of ladies cricket, I get to hang out with a lot of 25-year-old ladies at after-match drinks etc, and to watch the young men preening themselves around them. They (the ladies) come and sit with me when it gets too much for them, and we talk about how silly alpha males are. Maybe that is a sign of me getting old - being a father figure to these women.

I sometimes think you and I are polar opposites - I am very weak on self-analysis. I do overthink, but usually in relation to other people's actions. I am very chaotic, which is why I write back so quickly, and you're much more organised than you think. Oh, by the way, I reckon you achieved 2 out of your 7 checklist items on 9th November, because you wrote lyrically and eloquently about how you felt about the election on facebook, and for me that counts as writing.



My children were very cross with me for not choosing another pen name for The Failed Assassin, what with it being 95% sex (and some of it not exactly nice), but my thinking was that when history judges me, I want my body of work to be in one place, with one name. My agent hates me for writing so many different genres, and, in keeping with our fairly fractious relationship, refused to read a historical fiction novel I wrote a couple of years ago (which I might publish next year). And no, I don't pay him to read my books. And agents over here don't normally charge, not if they're bona fide agents. But then novels aren't academic papers or learned essays.

The plan had been to use nanowrimo as an external deadline, but I've fallen way behind because my day job is very busy all of a sudden (more busy than usual), the political situation has grabbed a large part of my brain, and because the short days are making me struggle. However, there is time to catch up, and I will very much try to. Oh, and having a bad back (though it is much better) doesn't help, because it always feels like the centre of my being has been ripped out, and I hate not being able to move freely. I'm working on a sequel to Dead Men, provisionally called Ice Child, which I hope will do its characters and the Antarctic justice.

The thing is, I have so many other novels running around in my head that I just want to get them down on paper and move on. I'm especially keen to write the one that's all about why time is going so quickly right now. I even read Lisa Randall's Dark Matter & The Dinosaurs as research, a good, great book if you ever get time to read it and have a fascination for astrophysics. If I can make the time to write more. I am lucky in that I can write quickly - 1,000 words in 30 minutes if I'm really inspired.

To come back to books and agents etc, I am fortunate in that I started life as a proof reader, so at least I am confident in my ability to read what I have written fairly objectively and efficiently, and that's what persuaded me to become a hybrid author after having one book traditionally published. Not that there's any money in it for me yet. And that's not really about the money; it's about having the independence to be able to write full-time. You must tell me more about your situation with the kulturråd. Perhaps sharing will let you be more sure about what to do.

Parenting - it is complex, isn't it? And no, don't adopt an accent. Be you. The thing is - Norwegians don't say much, so any voice appears strident to them. This was the issue we had with M's family - they were notoriously even more taciturn and silent than the average Norwegian. Is it our sense of otherness that makes us think even about the way we speak and are heard? Is it part of that, our, searching you talk about in your letter? I think it may be. Perhaps that part of us that's uncertain and insecure is that part of us that analyses how others see us. In the end, I always think that parents who question themselves make the best parents, not those who think they have done everything right. I still question our decision to have moved back to England, in particular this rural part of England, but the children seem to be doing well despite that decision, even though, to my great disappointment, none of them have become linguists. M used to tell me off for treating them as adults from when they could sit up, but I think/hope that this is one reason for them being, now, people that I can spend time with, even when we/I do things the other disapproves of.

I do miss Norway. Mostly the landscape, I must admit, and some of the male friends I made there. I found the people very xenophobic, I have to say, and when the shootings happened in 2011 (I have decided to cross his name out because I won't give him the oxygen of publicity) I wasn't really surprised that it was a terror attack by one of Norway's own. The one good thing I experienced as an immigrant was the free language lessons I got, thanks to which I became fluent in what I still hear as a beautiful language. On the other hand, I think I'm an immigrant wherever I am. Another example of otherness? Yes. I don't really feel at home where I am now, and I can see us moving away as soon as the children have all left home. Although, as I have promised them, wherever we move to, we'll always have a house with five bedrooms so they always have a room to come back to if they need sanctuary. That limits our options financially, but who cares? It's the family that counts.


Looking out of my office window, I can see C in the garden with the cat (they love each other) a few hours before she goes back to uni after 4 days here with us to recharge. It feels peaceful to be sitting here writing, and although I'll miss her and she'll dreadfully miss the cat, I'm glad she'll be going, and I'm glad that our children are strong enough to make their own ways in this difficult world.

Finally, I was so touched by the beginning of your letter. 'E gently asked me,' you write, and that created such a wonderful picture of love. When you first told me you had met a man, I hoped for a gentle one for you. And when I met him for the first time, I knew you'd found the right one. I am so so happy for you both. May that gentleness last for all time.

Thank you for letting me find another outlet (this letter and the last have used up 1 full reservoir of ink in my pen) for my thoughts. Actually, for kicking me back into writing. If Ice Child gets finished by the end of November, it will, in large part, be down to you.

Much love to you, and yours,

Richard





10 November 2016

An open letter to Trump and Brexit voters

Dear fellow inhabitants of the world,

2016 has been a year where many expectations and assumptions have fallen by the wayside, for a whole variety of reasons. It has also presented me, personally, with much confusion and possibly a lack of understanding. Perhaps you can help me make sense of the events which your way of voting has precipitated.

The world has become a much more difficult place since the crash in 2008, and I am one of those who has been frustrated by how the many ordinary people (that famous silent majority) have been forced to pay for the greed and mistakes of the few bankers and business people and establishment politicians (that famous one percent). What they have done to those much less well off than them is indeed sickening.

What has confused me, though, is that although the campaigns for Trump and Brexit have been led by exactly those same people, by that one percent, you have voted to make them a success. You have followed the words and actions of wealthy establishment figures and concluded that those leaders are you, that they will do things which will make you more successful, more wealthy, and your future brighter. I don't understand this at all, because their philosophies will not change; they will not all of a sudden become more altruistic and generous, less bent on making a profit, less self-centred, more caring. For them it is an impossibility, because, most of the time being a success means being ruthless and putting down anyone who might challenge their success.

Another thing I don't understand is that you call yourselves the common people (the "common" meaning everyday and normal) and yet you support movements which discriminate against the common people, those people of any religion or faith, those people of any gender, those people of any sexual orientation, those people of any colour, those people of any language, those people of any choice, who live alongside you, who contribute to the economies of where you live, those who sweat, bleed, piss, shit, cry, hurt, and fear just like you do. And you raise to a status of demigods your leaders who would discriminate against you because you smell of sweat, because you don't speak the way they do, because you're not the same perceived class as they are. To me, that makes no sense.

And finally, I really don't understand the sudden and overpowering invective against what the mass media is so famously calling the liberal elite. I don't even understand what this liberal elite is meant to be. Is it people with posh accents, or people with a university education, or people who are creative, or people with the aspiration of making the world a better place for the generations that come after them? And aren't all those things (except maybe the posh accent) praiseworthy and inclusive rather than being elitist? Isn't the quest for knowledge every single day of life a quest we should all be on? And isn't it our responsibility to make sure that everyone has the opportunity to acquire more knowledge rather than just standing still? Isn't our goal, in fact, the same - to make everyone equal? Maybe I have misunderstood.

Maybe this letter to you is just a way of clearing my mind of the anger and sadness I felt on 24th June after Brexit and again yesterday, when I saw the world suddenly become a much less kind place. Maybe it's me trying to hold my hands out to you in an effort for unity and compassion. Maybe it's me trying to knock down all the walls that already exist in the world rather than building even more.

Yours,


Richard